top of page


Credibility in the Interview Room: How Science-Based Interviewing Strengthens Evidence
Effective investigative interviewing is one of the strongest determinants of case success. Research shows that eyewitness and subject statements often shape whether cases are solved, making interview quality critical. Science-Based Interviewing (SBI) prioritizes information gathering over confessions or lie detection, using open-ended questions, active listening, and rapport to elicit more detailed, reliable accounts. This article explores how these evidence-based techniques

C. Edward
Jan 13, 20249 min read


The Cognitive Interview: A Cornerstone of Science-Based Interviewing in Law Enforcement
The cognitive interview is a cornerstone of Science-Based Interviewing and modern investigative practice. Grounded in cognitive psychology, it improves memory recall by using open-ended questions, context reinstatement, and multiple retrieval pathways. Research shows it produces significantly more accurate information than traditional interviews, making it essential for law enforcement interview and interrogation training focused on reliability, ethics, and bias reduction.

C. Edward
Dec 7, 20238 min read


Law Enforcement & Police Acronyms
In law enforcement and investigative work, acronyms are more than shorthand—they shape how information is shared, interpreted, and acted upon. From incident command to interviewing and evidence handling, understanding common law enforcement acronyms helps reduce miscommunication, improve clarity, and support sound decision-making. This reference breaks down frequently used terms to help investigators, analysts, and leaders better navigate the complex language that influences

C. Edward
Oct 6, 20238 min read


False Confessions: A Look into What They Are and Their Historical Context
False confessions are not rare anomalies. They are predictable outcomes of coercive, accusatory interviewing and pseudoscientific lie-detection practices. This article examines the history, psychology, and risk factors behind false confessions and their role in wrongful convictions. It contrasts confession-driven interrogation with Science-Based Interviewing, an evidence-based approach that prioritizes reliable information, corroboration, and sound questioning to reduce inves

C. Edward
Sep 24, 20239 min read


Red Teaming Assumptions: "No one would ever confess to a crime they did not commit"
False confessions persist because flawed assumptions go unchallenged. This article uses red teaming to critically test the belief that innocent people never confess, exposing how coercive tactics, bias, and psychological vulnerability undermine investigations. Grounded in research and real-world cases, it shows how Science-Based Interviewing (SBI) and key assumption checks strengthen critical thinking, protect memory and decision-making, and produce more reliable, ethical inv

C. Edward
Aug 30, 20234 min read


Brown v. Mississippi: A Landmark Case That Ended the Third Degree in Interrogation (1936)
Brown v. Mississippi marked a turning point: confessions obtained through brutal interrogation violate due process and are inadmissible.

Christian Cory
Nov 17, 20228 min read
bottom of page