Listen Before You Solve: What Crisis Negotiations Teach Managers About Conflict
“I understand where you’re coming from. Let’s work together to find a solution.” If you have sat through a corporate communication class, you have heard some version of that line. It sounds calm, empathetic, and productive. It is also, more often than not, bogus listening.
Why the standard script falls short
It is a common phrase in the corporate world, used to de-conflict and to work through communication problems between peers. When managers get thrown in the middle, two things are usually going on. There is a problem, and this style of conflict resolution is meant to help people save face.
The trouble is that it is the opposite of listening. It is problem-solving at the moment people are not being heard, which is exactly when communication matters most. A mediator or manager who uses empathy to gain an edge ends up damaging rapport instead of building it, especially when they start solving before they understand what is happening. They may have heard one side. They may even be a good mediator who has heard both.
So consider this: what if a mediator was not needed at all? If the two people in conflict have the space to work through the problem, understand things from each other’s side, and reach a conclusion on their own, the manager’s best move may be to get out of the way. The more a mediator can get both parties working together, and the quieter the mediator stays while holding a collaborative space, the faster the conflict tends to resolve.
The fire has been burning for a while
I was recently asked to build a training for a state negotiation association on the first five to ten minutes of a negotiation, because it has become such a hot topic. What do negotiators actually do in those first minutes? Frankly, it is not what most people expect. It is not solving the crisis with an easy tactic or finding the shortest route to resolving the thing right in front of you.
Rome was not built in a day, but it did not burn in a day either. The fire a person in crisis carries has most likely been kindling for some time. It has only now reached the point where other people notice, and by then it looks reckless, irrational, and maybe even threatening to some. The same is true of an employee who finally boils over at work.
The first five to ten minutes: safety, slow down, verify, listen
For law enforcement, the first priority is safety: do we have a safe place to work? If we do not, we make it one. Workplace teams face the same question. Before anything else, ask whether this is a safe environment (Workplace Violence Training & De-Escalation) to have the conversation, and fix that first.
Once it is safe, three things come next:
Slow things down. Resist the pull to act fast.
Verify information. Trust, but verify.
Begin to listen to the crisis the person is experiencing.
Why in crisis negotiations do you not just solve the problem?
Imagine you have had the worst day of your life. It was not the worst day because of one thing. If it is a death in the family, it is what that person meant to the family over the years, the relationship that was built, the medical problems that led up to the death, and the fact that you will not see them again. In that moment, hope is lost.
To understand that, you have to listen to a story, sometimes a long one, and get the person to tell you exactly what it looks like and what it means. The details at work will differ, but the principle holds true: fixing the visible problem in the first ten minutes skips the story that explains it. Skips the person in crisis feeling heard and is usually self-centered.
Ask like you don’t already know
How do you get someone to tell that story? One of the most useful habits is to ask like you do not already know the answer, even when you might. A wild concept, right? There are several reasons it works.
It opens the conversation into a two-way street. Instead of a one-way, assumption-driven direction from the listener, you get to learn something. You do not have to assume or suppose anything.
They tell it in their own words. Those words are the purest version of their thinking in that moment.
You see what they emphasize. You may know it is a big red truck. Hearing it from the speaker, you learn it is a red truck that is big, and that emphasis is unique to that person. Now you have something to talk about.
You can be genuine. When you truly do not know, you come off cleanly and do not suppose anything on their behalf.
Now consider the alternative. How terrible would it feel if every question you answered was one the listener already knew the answer to? It feels like a terrible interrogation, as if you are about to be caught out, unable to express what is going on.
Stay quiet and make space
The thread running through all of this is the same. Whether it is two coworkers in conflict, an escalating workplace violence risk, or a difficult employee in your office, the instinct to fix it fast is usually the thing that gets in the way. Make it safe, slow down, verify what you think you know, ask like you do not already know, and then stay quiet long enough to hear the story.
Does your team practice this before the pressure is on? Our training helps HR, compliance, and security teams and leaders build these skills for communication under pressure.
Comments